Radio showmanship (Jan-Dec 1942)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

TRENDS A rating of program patterns based on a special survey of outstanding, locally sponsored radio programs throughout the country. Let the TREND of these ratings, month to month, be your guide to better buying. PROGRAM RATINGS, NOVEMBER, 1941 Type Rating Last Month 1 Month Change Last Year 1 Year Change MUSIC .314 .317 -.003 .360 -.046 NEWS .208 .212 .004 .200 + .008 QUIZ .120 .125 -.005 .090 + .030 TALKS .097 .092 + .005 NO RATING INTERVIEWS .086 .083 + .003 NO RATING SPORTS .070 .066 + .004 .070 COMEDY .057 .057 .060 -.003 DRAMA .048 .048 .070 -.022 TOTAL 1.000 1.000 GROUPS Men 1 Mo. Change Women 1 Mo. Change Children 1 Mo. Change Music .276 + .001 .336 .007 .322 News .265 .006 .199 .003 .091 + .003 Quiz .116 .005 .116 .004 .149 .005 Talks .070 .134 + .007 .054 + .008 Interviews. . . .072 + .002 .092 + .004 .104 .003 Sports .124 + .007 .031 + .003 .052 + .001 Comedy. . . .044 .054 .104 + .002 Drama .03 3 + .001 .038 .124 .006 HAVE NEWS PROGRAMS REACHED THEIR PEAK? A year ago, on these pages, we debated the question of whether news programs had reached their highest possible average. At that time, news had jumped 30 points in three months. Our conchision then was as follows: ''No program whose interest varies so closely with life itself can be accurately forecast, but on the basis of TRENDS, we can hardly conclude that news has reached its peak. "On the contrary, the coming year should find more and better locallysponsored news shows on the air." That was the way we foresaw the future, one year ago. And the prediction came true. The rating of news increased constantly all through the year, and it hit a new high in August, 1941. But, something has happened since then. In the last three months, the rating of news has dropped 16 points. (In spite of that, news is still 8 points above its last year's mark.) Now, once again we are faced with the same question, but under entirely different circumstances. The interest in news shows is higher than ever, but there are more news shows today on the air, and interest must therefore be divided. Competition has become intense. The top-notch news pi JANUARY, 1942 33