Radio and television mirror (July-Dec 1951)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

Pont be 98 by VALDA SHERMAN Many mysterious changes take place in your body as you mature. Now, the apocrine glands under your arms begin to secrete daily a new type of perspiration containing milky substances which will — if they reach your dress — cause ugly stains and clinging odor. You'll face this problem throughout womanhood. It's not enough merely to stop the odor of this perspiration. You must now use a deodorant that stops the perspiration itself before it reaches— and ruins — your clothes. As doctors know, not all deodorants stop both perspiration and odor. But Arrid does! It's been proved that the new cream deodorant Arrid stops underarm perspiration 1 to 3 days safely— keeps underarms dry and sweet. Remember this, too. Arrid's antiseptic action kills odor on contact — prevents formation of odor up to 48 hours and keeps you "shower-bath" fresh. And it's safe for skin —safe for fabrics. So, don't be half-safe. Don't risk your happiness with half-safe deodorants. Be Arrvd-safe! Use Arrid to be sure. Arrid with Creamogen will not dry out, and it's so pleasant and easy to apply. Get Arrid today. V For complete removal of superfluous hair use ZiP Epilator _ Safe for face, arms, legs. Good stores, or send $1.10 to Jordeau Inc., South Orange, N. J. Mail this AD for Products to Test in YOUR HOME FREE! Send do Money— jost mail this ad with your ■ jiameandaddress. Wo send you Absolutely I .Free full-size food. household prodncts. Try I them, show friends big colorful catalog. Earn ■ big income, even in spare time, with over 200 I products — groceries, home prodncts, jew I elry, brushes etc. No money, no experi a ence needed. Wegiveyou credit. Mail this I ad with yourname. ZANOL, Richmond St. ■ Dept. 9036-B. Cincinnati 3, Ohio | MIDWEST LOOK TWICE...Yes, It's Easy To Self Midwest Everyday Cards Tarn your spare time into cash. Show Midwest All -Occasion Cards to friends. They'll buy 21-card bier value $1 Assortment fast. Your profit up to 60c 1 EXCLUSIVE Secret Pal. Eastern Star Cards. Also Pop-Up Books, Scented Stationery, other money-makers. CASH BONUS. Party Plan. Club fund-raising plan. too. Get Samples on approval. Write at once. CARD CO. ,1113 WASHINGTON AVE., DEPT. H35, ST. 10UIS1, MO, ...Train At Home For A WELL PAID CAREER PRACTICAL NURSING I Help Git the urgent need for Trained Practical Nurses. If you are between 18 and 65, it's easy to ' train at home in yonr spare time to take your place in this res pec tIed calling. Many earn while learning. High school is not needed. Nuree a equipment included. Mail this ad today for FREE Facts. . Wayne School Off Practical Nursing. Inc.. I 2525 Sheffield Ave., Desk E-55, Chicago 14, III. ■ Please rush FREE FACTS and Sample Lesson Pages. NAME. . Full AddresB_ It's easy to earn extra money. All you need is a little spare time and samples of PHILLIPS Everyday Greeting Cards to show your friends! Lovely designs, smart new ideas, big values produce orde fasti Just sell ) gorgeous $1 Assortments. Make up to 50c per box on quick sales! Also show Gift Wraps, Stationery, Novel Assortments, Humorous, Children's Book, brand new Birds and Wildflowers Book, Address Book, many more fast-selling items including gift items for all members of the family. No experience needed. FREE Booklet shows you how! Extra Profit Bonus Plan! Write now for SAMPLES ON APPROVAL to start earning at once . . . SEND NO MONEY, PHILLIPS CARD CO. 57 Hunt Street Newton, Mass. ACT TODAY! The Truth About Color TV (Continued from page 33) radiance, that amazing clarity. At times, too, color television gives the illusion of depth. It's real life color with a mysterious added something — call it a vibrancy. When you see it you will understand. This brings up the question: when are you going to see it? There is no easy, pat answer. It's quite a story, the struggle now going on in the television industry. The two titans of broadcasting, RCA (parent company of NBC) and CBS are met in mortal combat. Both sides are bent on winning. This being impossible, it's a good fight to watch. How it is resolved will affect every one of us with the slightest interest in television. It looked last fall as if we were going to have color television by Christmas. Sponsored and everything. In October the Federal Communications Commission, after a year of examining all competing color processes, gave the CBS system its blessing. After ten years in the laboratory, it looked as if color TV had come out for good. The CBS picture "is most satisfactory from the point of view of texture, color fidelity and contrast," said the FCC. Moreover, "receivers and station equipment are simple to handle." RCA, which earnestly wants to see its color picture adopted and Columbia's picture rejected, decided to fight the FCC. Its picture had been called poor and fuzzy. The FCC said it contained a "time error" that contaminated the colors. "That's only your opinion," raged RCA (or words to that effect) and went straight to Federal Court. Down came an injunction, restraining CBS from telecasting color on a regular or commercial basis. (Demonstrations are continuing, however) . Back to the lab went RCA's engineers. A few weeks after they'd obtained the injunction, RCA men came up with a new color tube. The press (but not the FCC) was invited to view it. A New York Herald-Tribune reporter said that RCA's new color picture was better than its old one, but still not up to the CBS picture. Meanwhile, the judges in Chicago went on examining the case. As of this writing, that is where the controversy stands. Now let's see why such a battle is going on and what the stakes are. Key to the conflict is the inherent differences in the competing color systems. Granted, the CBS system gives a better picture. But the system has its weak points. Chief of these is that it is no way "compatible" with existing TV sets. Should the CBS system be adopted as standard, you could not receive colorcasts, even in black and white. And your set wouldn't fetch a very pretty price at the second hand store. RCA's system, despite the alleged poor quality of its picture, is perfectly compatible with the set you now own. NBC could send out a show in color and you'd receive it very nicely in black and white. If you bought a "converter," you'd receive it in color (assuming it was being sent in color, mind you.) Now comes another flaw in the RCA case. It has not yet got around to making a decent converter. The FCC "First Report" says that at no time was a "practical converter" demonstrated by RCA. This, as you can see, offsets RCA's advantage of compatibility. The CBS color system admits to being completely incompatible. Its adoption would require your buying two fairly expensive gadgets for your present set. First, an "adapter." This would enable you to receive color shows in black and white. But should you want to see them in color (as who wouldn't?) you'd have to buy a device to fit over your screen, a "converter." The adapter would cost you from thirty to fifty dollars. The converter comes a little higher, seventy-five to one hundred dollars, plus an installation fee. Adding this to the price you paid for your set originally, you can see that home entertainment comes pretty high. A third alternative may be considered: You can buy a companion set with a second picture tube. This will cost somewhat more than the combined cost of an adapter and a converter. But it looks prettier. Converters are ugly gadgets. Once a set has been converted for color it can still get regular black and white programs — simply by switching off the converter. At the time the court injunction came, some set manufacturers already were making adapters and converters. CBS provided all manufacturers with charts and drawings for this purpose a year ago. RCA refused flatly to go into production on these color devices, however. And RCA, as you know, is the largest and most powerful TV manufacturer in the land. Within a short time, color will come to the consumer more cheaply. Sets can be bought with built-in adapters. An RCA engineer admitted at an FCC hearing that an adapter could be installed in the factory at a cost of about seven dollars. Should the CBS system become the standard — in other words, should RCA lose its court battle — you'll see a gradual obsolescence of existing equipment. Remember how it was when electric refrigerators came into vogue? The old, non-electric ice boxes got fewer and fewer. By now, they have virtually disappeared. When asked, "Should I buy a black and white set today or wait for one that has built-in color?" Frank Stanton, president of CBS, had this to say: "If you buy now you will enjoy the I current black and white programs. On the other hand, a combination color and black-and-white set, when available, will be more compact and save you money. If, however, you decide you don't want to wait — buy a set only from a manufacturer who will give you positive assurance that the set you buy can be converted to color." Now you know. Next question is: How long shall we have to wait foi the Court to decide? Said the New York Times recently: "The confusion and uncertainty over the whole immediate future of TV is going to continue in 'the minds of both the public and the industry for some time to come." One of the Federal judges sitting on the case in Chicago said, "It is unthinkable that we can decide this issue in a day, a week or a month." And a decision in Chicago will not be the end of the .controversy. The is