United States of America v. Motion Picture Patents Company and others (1914)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

Page. Point X. — The six patents analyzed 36 (1) Latham patent 36 (2) The Smith patent for the framing device 40 (3) The Jenkins-Armat patent. 41 (4) The Pross patent 47 (5) The film patent 48 (6) The camera patent 53 Point XL — The film patent does not cover the positive print. Phraseology employed in letters patent establishes this 54 Point XII. — Cases dealing with relation of patent laws and the Sherman Act not discussed in our main brief although there cited, pages 21, 22 58 Point XIII. — Final observations 68