United States of America v. Motion Picture Patents Company and others (1914)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

20 eral Film Company enjoys this monopoly by virtue of the fact that it is owned by the ten manufacturers and is constituted by them their sole distributing agency. Before the General Film Company was organized there were over 100 exchanges doing the business which it now controls. Elsewhere we have stated the methods by which it acquired the business of those exchanges. In our main brief (Part X, p. 239) there is printed a list of exhibitors, all witnesses called on behalf of defendants, who testified on crossexamination that the films manufactured by the so-called licensed manufacturers are necessary in order to conduct a profitable business as an exhibitor. This is the testimony of defendants' own witnesses. The business of distributing this class of film to all the exhibitors has been monopolized by the General Film Company. No exhibitor, licensed or unlicensed, in the United States can obtain any of the film of any of the ten licensed manufacturers from any other source than the General Film Company (except, of course, the Greater New York Film Rental Company, as above stated in New York City) . This is a monopoly of a part of the trade and commerce among the several States within the meaning of section 2 of the Sherman Act, which provides that every person who shall monopolize, or attempt to monopolize, or combine or conspire with any other person or persons to monopolize any part of the trade or commerce