United States of America v. Motion Picture Patents Company and others (1914)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

41 pose restrictions upon the use of the projecting machine and upon commerce in positive films which contemplate an absolute control of that commerce. Mr. Albert E. Smith, the inventor of this device, in the course of a long examination as a witness for the defense, testified in regard to this patent at the following places in the record: Direct examination, III, 1715, fol. 4, to 1717; crossexamination, III, 1757, fols. 1 and 2. Mr. Smith, on page 1716, describes the framing device. He says that he considers that this improvement on the projecting machine had great potency and value in building up the business. On page 1757, fol. 1, he says the patent made an improvement on the projecting machine. (3) THE JEXKIXS-ARMAT PATEXT. This is No. 586953, granted July 20, 1897, to Charles F. Jenkins and Thomas Armat. It has, therefore, expired. Although the Armat Company assigned five patents to the Patents Company, all of them enumerated in each of the license agreements, the only one of the fixe referred to by defendants in the proof and arguments is this JenkinsArmat patent. This patent relates to the shutter of the projecting machine. No other part of the complicated projecting machine is covered by the Jenkins and Armat patent. Vol. VI, pages 3266 et seq., con