United States of America v. Motion Picture Patents Company and others (1914)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

62 under the patent laws, and the nature of the right given him, by which he can put his competitor engaged in interstate commerce out of business. And if two or more persons, under whatever name or form or method, however subtly devised, agree to accomplish by unlawful means that which they could accomplish in the way provided by law, then such conduct, if directed against the business of the competitors and necessarily directly affecting it, is a conspiracy against trade, and if that trade is interstate trade, it is an offense under the Sherman antitrust act. (301:) The power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce is complete and supreme. It is lawful to go into the cashregister business. Anyone may, as a matter of right, go into the cash-register business and make his products the subject of interstate commerce, and may continue to do so until he is restrained by a court of equity upon the fact being established that he is an infringer; and even after the establishment of such fact he is amenable only to the court issuing the injunction or may be subject to the payment of damages or profits or both, but he is not figuratively an outlaw to be brought in dead or alive and his business confiscated by a patentee who is unwilling or afraid to pursue him by lawful methods and who would destroy his business, interstate though it is, by unlawful means.