Richardson's handbook of projection (1927)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

MANAGERS AND PROJECTIONISTS 492c a consideration of the fact that from a given point of observation the screen may appear of unequal brightness over its area. The danger of this inequality being serious increases rapidly as the value of the above mentioned ratio in reflecting TABLE No. 2 No. 0 deg. 5 deg. 10 deg. 20 deg. 30 deg. 40 deg. 50 deg 1 101) 1(30 100 99 98 98 97 2 61 61 60 59 58 57 56 3 80 79 78 77 76 74 70 4 113 109 106 94 83 80 79 5 82 82 82 81 81 81 81 6 132 125 115 88 66 50 37 7 163 150 134 93 61 43 31 8 414 361 295 153 71 32 17 9 436 385 319 161 73 34 20 10 427 380 300 163 73 36 18 11 80 79 77 74 69 68 68 12 301 281 240 140 76 43 23 13 274 255 223 132 73 43 24 14 271 244 205 132 77 45 26 15 220 200 173 115 68 40 24 16 357 315 264 149 73 38 21 17 76 75 74 73 72 71 69 18 338 305 252 129 75 42 22 19 151 139 125 89 60 43 30 20 78 77 77 76 75 74 73 21 291 273 204 83 55 48 47 22 217 205 167 89 63 55 51 23 357 328 280 145 66 36 21 24 228 215 194 140 83 54 35 25 80 79 78 76 74 72 69 26 86 86 85 83 82 80 76 27 82 80 79 76 72 69 66 28 72 71 70 68 66 64 63 29 450 417 324 150 67 35 22 30 348 280 2H0 105 58 31 18 31 319 281 231 130 69 37 21 32 436 347 269 127 60 43 20 33 84 84 78 76 76 75 75 34 280 242 150 67 48 39 37 35 294 284 242 148 71.5 34 19.6 36 409 394 342 186 82 37.4 19.6 37 309 298 268 163 77.2 38.6 21 powers increases. Assuming now that we adopt the value of 4 as the limiting value of the reflecting power ratio, it is possible from the figures in Tables 3, 4 and 5 to choose the best screen for any one of the cases considered. For instance, assuming that the maximum angle of observation is 20°, it will be noted that all values in the under 20° ratio column of Table 3 are less than 4. Therefore from the standpoint of distribution any one of the screens in Class A will be satisfactory for use