Screen Opinions (1923-24)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

114 Screen Opinions Tells the Truth Percentage Figure Values Masterful 100% Superior 95% Excellent 00% Very good 80% Good 65% Average 50% Fair 40% I’oor 25% Every picture reviewed in SCREEN OPINIONS is analyzed according to definite standards before arriving at positive percentage value. The independent summary in “The Opinion” is submitted to you for final judgment, because in all cases you must have the last word when it comes to selecting the pictures. A thorough reading of “The Opinion” will give a clearer idea of the nature of the picture, so that you may be better able to judge its money-making possibilities for you, its entertainment value and suitability for your patronage. “WHO’S CHEATING?”— 50% (Especially prepared for the screen) Reviewed August, 1924 Theme — Cowardly youth develops fighting spirit in mine disaster VALUE Photography — Average — Not credited Moral standard — Average. Story — Average — Melodrama — Family. Cast — Good — All-Star. Direction — Average — Not credited. Technique — Average. Spiritual influence — Average. Moral — Arousing latent courage. Larry Fields Myrtle Meers Waugh Mr. Fields CAST Ralph Kellard Zena Keefe William Tooker Montague Love Producer — Lee -Brad ford. Footage — About 5000 feet. Distributor — State Rights. THE OPINION Production of average entertainment value for cheap locations. A fair amount of suspense and some thrills in adventures of youth at mine where he is placed unconscious on a runaway freight car, and later becomes a victim of a mine explosion set by villian. Ralph Kellard does well as the cowardly youth who finds himself through love and force of circumstances. “ENEMY SEX”— 90% (Especially prepared for the screen) Reviewed August. 1924 Theme — Romance of girl who refused VALUE Photography — Excellent — Karl Brown. Moral standard — Fair. Story — Excellent — Drama — Adults. Star — Excellent — Betty Compson. Direction — Excellent — James Cruze. Technique — Excellent. Spiritual influence — Neutral. Moral — Happiness result of well-doing. be had and relinquished desire for duty CAST Dodo Baxter Betty Compson Garry Lindaberry Percy Marmont Judge Massingle ...Huntly Gordon Albert Edward Sassoon Sheldon Lewis Producer — Paramount. Footage — 7861 feet. Distributor — Famous Players-Lasky. THE OPINION Unusually strong sex appeal. Betty Compson was never more fascinating. Director Cruze and staff have turned out an original and human production in which most trifling details are polished to a finish. Dot Farley and1 Mae Busch do excellently in the trio of women of which “Dodo” is the bright light. Dodo’s scheming to make both ends meet, her childish flirtations with every man she meets, her mad love for a married man, and her1 renunciation of an opportunity, for illegitimate love at the appeal of a drunkard she had promised to help, are features presented absorbingly. f HAVE YOU SUGGESTIONS? If you have, write us about them. We are planning to make Screen Opinions more valuable than ever next season. Help us do so. (Printed in U. S. A.)