The screen writer (June 1945-May 1946)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

TRITE, STALE — AND PROFITABLE? anything that's new in a motion picture." Much of Hollywood's production is governed by the formula of the successive repetition of success. In fact, too much. Not so long ago, we recommended a dramatic story (by another writer) to an eminent producer-director. After reading, he asked: "What's good about it? Can you name me any successful play, novel or picture that told this same story?" On the other hand, there is the enterprising producer, who welcomes something definitely out of the groove, and encourages you to write it. Back in the Dust Bowl era, two unrelated headlines appeared in the same newspaper, on different pages. Bannered was the exploit of an Oregon outlaw, who had slain two National Park foresters and two deputy sheriffs. Almost buried, the other item concerned a WPA scandal in New Mexico, where men had been thrown off relief jobs for not voting the ticket of the local political machine. A telephone call was made to the producer, an intelligent and imaginative fellow, and the two themes literally thrown together over the wire. Although a series picture, without special exploitation or publicity, Wyoming Outlaw did 142 percent of normal business because of the originality and freshness of its ingredients. The success of this Western, taken literally from one day's headlines, has been duplicated by experiences of other writers, proving that the use of fresh material is possible — and profitable. Another angle of approach to the problem of "what's new" may be found by examination of possible dramatic incident. In Ward's Santa Fe Stampede, the heavies did not bump off the hero's pal, as usual. No, they shot down a tiny five-year-old girl. As a result of the story which grew out of this then-novel act of villainy, the picture played to more than normal theatre business. Coincidental ly, about a year later came Rangers of Fortune, a million-dollar special, in which the heavy shot down a ten-yearold girl. Ward has also experimented with feminine heavies (Jezebel 19