The screen writer (June 1946-May 1947)

Page scan 00040 from The screen writer

Record Details:

Title:
The screen writer
Date:
June 1946-May 1947
Publisher:
Hollywood : Screen Writers' Guild, Inc.
Volume:
The screen writer (June 1946-May 1947)
Leaf #:
00040
Language:
English
Collection:
Broadcasting & Recorded Sound and Hollywood Studio System
Format:
Periodicals
Contributor:
Media History Digital Library
Sponsor:
Media History Digital Library
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Description:
'A publication of the Screen Writers' Guild, Inc.'
Date Added:
August 08, 2024
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

THE SCREEN WRITER ness of the dramatic construc¬ tion. And, of course, this review would be incomplete without a word of praise for Aram Hagopian, Mac Killop’s ace proofread¬ er. Nary a misspelled word or grammatical error escaped Hagopian’s scrutiny — swamped though he must have been. How¬ ever, on Page 327 (Hagopian must have been exhausted), we detected a boner; “ignorami”; obviously what was meant was “ignoramuses.” Anatole Pinkus produces a fine bit of deceptive bookbinding. Spellbound by his superb crafts¬ manship, you are trapped into buying the book. What happens next is no fault of Pinkus’. But the performances of those mentioned would hardly have been possible without the contri¬ bution of John Newman, paper manufacturer. Particularly de¬ serving of mention is his wise choice of snow-white paper which does much to relieve the somberness of the story. ★ 36