Sociology of film : studies and documents (1946)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

THE ADULT AND THE CINEMA In addition, we kept a selected group of people whose lives and social circumstances were intimately known to us under constant observation. We sent them to see specific films and recorded their reactions and impressions. Thus considerable material was collected. Yet I resist the temptation to publish this material or some parts of it, for several reasons. First, I believe an investigation of this kind presupposes a thorough understanding of the psychological and sociological mechanisms of film reactions. Second, however considerable or weighty our material may have been, we were not able to cover wide enough regions in order to be sure that the material obtained was really representative. Third, while the investigations proceeded, we were never certain how long we were to be allowed to work with the given facilities. We had first agreed with Mr. Rank to work for a trial period of four months. After they had elapsed, we were granted another six months to continue our work. Before this half-year had passed, the technical and financial facilities were withdrawn as the investigations were thought to be of cno practical use to the film industry'. Naturally, I anticipated such a decision. Five months before Mr. Rank decided to stop our work as far as his theatres were concerned, I had approached the Editor of The Picturegoer who very kindly allowed me to use his paper in order to obtain film-reaction material. From the beginning of our investigations I was convinced that a quantitative and purely statistical method would not produce any satisfactory results. A study of Professor Blumer's book, which has been discussed on preceding pages of this book, confirmed my conviction that only a method of case studies might be able to provide us with reliable patterns for a sociological appraisal of film reactions. Moreover, before I had accepted any financial support for this investigation from the film industry, I had looked out and searched for psychological literature which might give us help and guidance in our work. This search was disappointing, as our contemporary psychologists and social scientists appear to have neglected the cinema to an extent for which I have no explanation to offer. Only from two psychologists have I received much help and encouragement. The majority of our contemporary psychologists pay hardly any attention to the cinema. When they do, they confine themselves to generalities. Take, for example, Jung, who in his book 179