Sodom and Gomorrah : the story of Hollywood (1935)

Record Details:

Title:
Sodom and Gomorrah : the story of Hollywood
Date:
1935
Publisher:
Los Angeles : End Poverty League
Volume:
Sodom and Gomorrah : the story of Hollywood
Leaf #:
00091
Language:
English
Collection:
Books
Format:
Books
Contributor:
Media History Digital Library
Sponsor:
Media History Digital Library
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Description:
Date Added:
March 28, 2024
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

SODOM A N D RRAH > BRIE.N SUED !•'< >;: DAM IX REN "Pat < )'Bri and hib it . aylor ( I <we their landlady, Etta Goldsmith, $520.97 hold furnishings it was charged in a suit for that )unt on hie today in the municipal court. "Various articles of furniture, dishes, and fixtures were t icated the premi Xorth which they occupied one year, the complaint said. "A love seat, badly damaged, worth $14.75; apot in a gold cabinet, allegedly missing and worth $7.50; and a bedroom rug, damaged, worth $341. were ld smith sought to recover. . his wife denied th< bill." Despite the c atively great number of alcoholics and drug addicts connected with the 61m industry, the great moral infringement among the screen people, a=> in their product, is sexual license. Verily, \ enus is the trademark of Hollywood great art, the great joy, the great occupati* and the great diversion of the film capital is lo turally, where there is such a demand, if it is to be satisfied there must be an equally great supply. The provision of th compris the major pro* cu tive, male star, director, and what-not. Necessity is the mother of invention, and these ingenious