Sodom and Gomorrah : the story of Hollywood (1935)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

SODOM AND GOMORRAH 115 having their finger prints taken \ certain very powerful film executive Bed in terror, All tin who know about the incident are still wondering why. From these things it can -n that the reformers might just as well expect Alphonse Capone to sponsor a campaign against illegal profits as expect motion picture executives to reform their industry. I lolly wood's one stock argument against accusations of loose morals i> that there arc similar cases in other cities. To begin with, that argument is a.s shallow as most of the film capital's other points, as though a Chicago gangster were to justify his violent acts on the pretext that gangsters in other cities do the same thing, it you are shot by a gangster in one city, you ought not to mind, for someone might be shot by a gangster in another city, which evens everything. However, granting that some people in other localities and in other lines of work than pictures do commit some, or all, of the disgusting crimes against moral and conventional law that are per petrated in Hollywood, at least most of this alleged immorality is divorced from the various husiness institutions with which the non-cinema sinners are associated. It is not so much what the Hollywood celebrities choose to do as their private diversion that merits censure, but that the standards of a great wielding a more subtle influence than the press, should be lowered