Sodom and Gomorrah : the story of Hollywood (1935)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

SODOM AND GOMORRAH 163 ated his love, proceeds to go into a very deep psychological study of the possessive qualities of a man's love and devotion to a woman. He explains how a man might love two women if it were not RE \L love, hut it" it were real love, he could not, for, as he explains it. the woman a man loves is in his sight the acme of perfection. On the obvious truth that there could be only one acme of perfection in a man's eyes at one time, he re his case His discussion of a problem that would trouble the minds of the world's greatest psychologists is ridiculously presumptuous as to defy description of it. Lei us hope that most of his declarations were invented in the mind of the author, foi if Gary Cooper were really the inventor of this silly discourse, it is just one more hit of proof that the standard of mentality in motion picture players leaves something to be desired. Many articles have been written about Joan Crawford, and her career will probably furnish food for countless more. Those which already constitute history are immensely enlightening and at the .same time amusing. One of the later of these biographical ^ketches is almost a direct refutation of the assertions made in a rival publication of a month previous. This article commeno by telling of the author's palpitating heart as he rang the bell of Joan's apartment. He is greeted by the famous star whose deep, "pensive" e