Sodom and Gomorrah : the story of Hollywood (1935)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

SODOM AXD GOMORRAH 223 brother-in-law of Adolph Zuknr. the pr< de: Jack and Harry Cohn, together with a host relatives and friends, rule the Columbia Studio Even the less important in the indt? are rilled by the relatives of the executives or stars. A few out of the everlasting string are Bill Bow, cousin of the famous, or infamous, Clara, in property at Paramount; Hal LeSeuer, brother of Joan Crawford, in stock at M-G his w Miss Crawford' stand-in; Barbara Brown, cousin of Jean Harlow, is Miss Harlow's stand-in, while another cousin is an office boy: Jesse Lasky Jr. is on the writer's staff at Fox where his father is a producer; Katherine De Mille, daughter of the fan* il, has be come a featured player at M-G-M. From this picture of the personnel situation it can readily be seen why the motion picture industry is carried on in such a haphazard fashion. It is an unfortunate fact that being a relative of even so great a genius as Louis B. Mayer does not insure writing ability or directorial talent. When these people clutter up the various dep;< ments in which they have no business to be. the result is obvious. Vfter all, what has either Ruth or Mitzi Cummings produced in the field of literature or drama that would indicate they are creative writers' Or what has Sylvia Thalher^ contributed to the screen that would warrant her