Sound motion pictures : from the laboratory to their presentation (1929)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

236 SOUND MOTION PICTURES to-day to actors, writers, and directors who have the foresight and vision to recognize their opportunities, for the coming of sound means progress, not merely to the film, but to those who will contribute to it and grow with it. To what extent the foreign motion picture star will be affected by the addition of dialogue to motion pictures, time alone can say. It is doubtful, however, whether European accents can be adjusted to fit the requirements of the American market except in parts that call for such accent. Foreign artists who have experience in Americanmade motion pictures should be of considerable value to motion pictures produced in their own countries. Thus far in our inquiry we have been either emphasizing sound as apart from sight, or even dealing with it exclusively. That is right and necessary, for it is the newer element that provides our text. However, if we stop for a moment to think of the whole reality, we see at once that the industry is concerned not with the novel facility alone but with a double appeal, a combination of appeals, to the ear and the eye together. Such an attitude, in its comprehensiveness, might lead one to jump at the conclusion that we are in the midst of a movement to substitute machines for men, i. e., talking moving pictures for stage dramas or other stage entertainments. The conclusion, furthermore, would seem to be supported by evidence, for Interference, among other productions, appears to be a "canned" version of a "real" play, just as a Martinelli record is a "canning" of the maestro's art. Granting the instance — it can be refuted ! — for the nonce let me ask how far it carries us. In what sense is The Broad' way Melody the mere "canning" of a stage play? Is there no sign, for example, of the influence, the dominance, of the technique of the silent cinema? Consider the number and variety of scenes, for one thing. But beyond and above that there is the simple fact that a sound picture is ma