Sponsor (July-Sept 1959)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

^ SPONSOR-SCOPE continued There may be something meaty for tv to ponder in the eontinuing trend by bellwether P&G toward reducing its daytime investments. The Cincinnati giant will spend more dollars than ever in tv during the 1959-60 season, but the daytime sliee will again be smaller. Measured by years, P&G's daytime billings in 1959 will be 20% less than they were in 1958, while the daytime share in that year was 10/v under 1957. From the media director of one of the P&G agencies SPONSOR-SCOPE gathered that these were the underlying reasons for the trend: 1 ) With sets-in-use about the same and shares down, the lower cost efficiency is making it tough for the less housewife-oriented brands to stay in network tv. 2) A conviction that in terms of audience delivered daytime is still much overprieed compared to nighttime, and that the basie price ratio of half the nighttime rate is ae outdated as the seven-ineh tv receiver. Despite P&G, network tv finished the first six months of this year with record daytime billings. The daytime share of total billings was the highest — 28.4% — in history. Another evidence of daytime's rising strength is what it's been doing vis-a-vis the women's and home magazines. Here's a comparison of network tv daytime billings and women's-home magazine advertising for the first six months: network 1959 1958 ABC TV $13,073,578 $ 7,557,490 CBS TV 41,986,570 37,460,641 NBC TV 33,349,136 24,879,937 Total Daytime $88,409,284 $69,897,937 MAGAZINE Ladies' Home Journal Better Homes & Gardens Good Housekeeping McCall's Everywoman's-Family Circle American Home Woman's Day House Beautiful House & Garden Living for Young Homemakers Total Service Magazines *This represents an 8rr increase over vantage over these 10 magazines is 24%, 1959 $15,782,000 13,758,000 11,197,000 9,581,000 5,413,000 4,665,000 3.271,000 3,337,000 2,017,000 2.069.000 $71, 090,000 * 1958 $13,787,000 13,719,000 10,895,000 9,659,000 3,782,000 4,815,000 2,344,000 3.360.000 1.842,000 1.776.000 $65,979,000 the like period of 1958. The combined network adcompared to but 6r( last year. In view of the boom status of nighttime network tv, Madison Avenue media directors are bemused by this eurrent paradox: Network salesmen have stepped up the competitive heat to snag whatever pennies may be still lying around. The pressure behind them stems from thi -; motive: Sales racked up from here on out represents profit money, and apparent l\ all the networks are bent on showing record profit margins for that quarter. If Minnesota Mining (BBDO, Minneapolis) wants to sell its tape line to kids this fall, it will have to go spot or buy a piece of some network show. The account's about given up its quest for a network time period for the Magic Circus (30 minutes) that it's been testing in five markets. DFS is now looking at this show for General Mills as a Sunday 5:30 prospect. 29 august 1959 23