Sponsor (Oct-Dec 1962)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

'SPONSOR-SCOPE Interpretation and commentary on most significant tv/ radio and marketing news of the week 10 DECEMBER 1962 / copyright iotc The No. 1 topic of trade palaver in Madison Avenue tv circles last week was the nature of the midseason changes applied by the networks to their nighttime schedules and the possible flaws revealed thereby in the networking planning structure. Key question stemming from talk: could the fact that NBC TV had to resort to a second weekly exposure of feature films and that ABC TV plugged up a prime hour with reruns indicate an absence in the business of programing planning in depth? The posers of the query noted that they realized that the networks were making a tremendous investment in regularly scheduled programing hut what thev couldn't understand is how come the networks, in order to keep up quality, do not provide for some spares to draw from in the event of a midseason emergency. A side inventory of this sort, they pointed out. would seem mandatory if only to protect the flow of short term contracts. Loads of optimism about spot tv's state of health for the first quarter of 1963 prevails among key reps. A gauge cited hv one of these reps: last week his office submitted availabilities for four times the number of accounts as it did the parallel week of the year before. Another happy sign : quite a number of the inquiries point to a 7 January schedule start, whereas last year the new year buyers in large measure pencilled in their schedule for late January takeoffs. Still another factor favoring spot tv: advertisers who haven't fared so well in ratines with the current season's network schedules will from agencv indications transfer hunks of their investment to the other side of the medium. If you take the estima'es coming out of the TvB as an indicator of eventual ratios, national-regional spot tv could wind up ahead of network tv in the FCCreport on the industry's 1962 revenues. Should the figures turn out that way it would he the first time that spot has had the edge in at least eight years. Spot billings, as it is. have been steadilv edging up on network in the FCC reports in recent vears; that is. the margin has been "ettintr narrower and narrower. With TvB's indicator as a base, SPONSOR-SCOPE is herewith taking a stab at guestimatins what the FCC 1962 time sales report might show for the various seetors of the medium — as compared to 1961 : 1962 1961 SOURCE Network National-Regional spot Local TOTAL $535 million '■) 15 million 220 million 1 ,300 million * 180.2 million 168.") million 211.2 million 81.160 million (For TvB's estimate of spot tv billings for third quarter see SPONSOR WEEK, page 11. 1 The SRA is getting closer on its annual radio spot estimates: for 1961 it was only 2.3% under the FCC national-regional spot tally of S 1 37.3.>2.000. Estimate out of the SRA showed a 1.0',' loss on the year, whereas the FCC computation make the national spot revenue for 1961 an increase of 1.3% over 1960. For highlights of FCC--, radio-fm financial data for 1961 see SPONSOR WFFK. page 11.1 SPONSOR/10 DECEMBER 1962 19