Sponsor (Oct-Dec 1964)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

manufacturers of heat-processed canned dog fare). Generally speaking, Gaines dry dog food had the sales edge in most TvAR markets, with Purina Dog Chow snapping at its heels in some close races. The standing of nationally-advertised Purina, incidentally, swung widely, depending on what market was being measured. In Cleveland, for example, purchases of Gaines were reported by 19.7 percent of famihes, with 17.2 percent going with Purina Dog Chow. In Jacksonville, however, the Gaines' score was 20.7 percent while that of Purina was only 9.8 percent. Carefully sifting the returns from all eight markets, TvAR found only a handful of brands that ranked in the top place in their categories: • Pall Mall cigarets (and only among women who smoked nonfilter brands). • Instant Maxwell House coffee (in homes using instant coffee primarily). • Kellogg's corn flakes (although some of the moppet-angled new brands were showing gains). • Bayer aspirin (with Bufferin, interestingly, showing sales drops and Excedrin showing gains). • Vicks cold remedies (nose drops, chest rub and cough drops, in their respective categories). When measured against the total number of brands checked — 590 brands, most of them national or major regional, in 12 product categories, — the number of marketto-market leaders making a clean sweep in their particular category is astonishingly low in an era of mass marketing and national network media. What did TvAR have to say of this? And what of brand leadership in women's hair sprays, in which Alberto VO-5 leads in four markets while Aquanet leads in three others? Or of margarine marketing where a different brand is tops in more than half the markets? The moral, as TvAR's Robert M. McGredy, managing director, stated it, was one that TvAR had cited before: "There is an increasing awareness on the part of advertisers and agencies that product usage and brand popularity zig-zags from one market to another. This, in turn, has been reflected in an increasing use of and reliance on spot tv." ♦ EXAMPLES OF VARIATIONS IN BRAND POSITION BRAND Budweiser beer Folger's regular coffee Maxwell House regular coffee Nabisco Shredded Wheat Coricidin cold tablets Pertussin cough syrup Calo canned dog food Esso gasoline Aquanet hair spray Mrs. Filbert's margarine Vitalis hair dressing 7-Up MARKET Jacksonville Pittsburgh San Francisco Jacksonville Jacksonville San Francisco Boston Charlotte Washington San Francisco Baltimore Jacksonville Boston Baltimore Washington Jacksonville Son Francisco Charlotte Baltimore Cleveland Baltimore San Francisco San Francisco Charlotte RANK SHARE^ 1 10 21.5% 1.9 1 5 24.8 3.1 1 5 36.6 6.8 3 n 13.5 3.7 1 4 38.5 9.2 2 7 12.7 2.7 1 11 22.7 1.3 1 11 35.9 2.2 1 7 34.9 6.3 1 9 37.2 4.4 1 5 29.9 8.6 1 5 35.5 4.2 Figures shown represent families buying (or using) the brand expressed as percent of those buying (or using) the product. For example, in Jacksonville 21.9 percent of the families buying beer for home consumption purchased Budweiser. Source: 1964 TvAR Brand Comparison Report, based on interviewing during March and May, December 7, 1964 31