Sponsor (Nov 1946-Oct 1947)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

most of it goes unanswered TWO-THIRDS of the program mail ol radio's biggest buyer of airtime is tied into big bundles and warehoused, unanswered, to gather dust for five years. Yes, Procter and Gamble is currently satisfied to answer just one out of every three letters that come to its 29 programs. The only listeners who rate answers are the gimme gang. If dialer-writers don't want something, their letters are simply put through a routine of scanning and tabulation, then stored awa) . This is the sponsor who lays $15,000, 000 on dotted lines annually to bring his -.ales message to radio audience-' P. c\ G. spends thousands each year 22 in doing a public relations job. Yet P. & G. has been content for the last five years to ride the crest of war-born high product demand, and wide turnover in listener and consumer groups. The big soap firm can show a rising sales curve and steady listening indices to disprove any charge of mishandling letters and losing listener interest. Nevertheless P. & G. officials are partially nullifying their public relations efforts by allowing listener frustrations to pile up in the unanswered two-thirds of the program mail. With the nation once more in a competitive dee economy, P. & G. and other sponsors with a laisse: faire attitude toward audience mail may well be riding for a listener fall when the backlog of annoyed-audience reaction piles up. Many advertisers who do answer mail feel their job is done when the mail is acknowledged by postcard or impersonal form letter. Smart-minded ad agenc) executives insist that this is only part ot the job. It is the exception rather than the rule for an advertiser to handle his audience mail to his own best advantagi Usually, the job falls to untrained typists and receptionists who have to decide whether the mail contains publicity, copy, radio, or promotional ideas, and whether or not a letter deserves an answer. The same advertisers, when (Please turn to page 49) SPONSOR