Sponsor (July-Dec 1949)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

"Strength of giveaway9* divides prist* ar award slum the actual airing of a show. The few programs in network radio and TV that are huilt from the ground up as vehicles to hand out mountains of prizes have the factor in its strongest version. Despite the pleas of producers and networks who have such shows that the "public insists on them, and likes them as entertainment." these shows arc not designed primarily for entertainment. The) are a Santa Claus operation basically. This fact is not guesswork, and ha nothing to do with moral judgments. Virtuall) ever) minute-by-minute reaction study, made b) research organizations, mi this i\| I giveawaj show (see "Class I" listings in illustrations ' reveals this fact. \\ henever the drags for a moment, whenevei 26 the program's star or master-of-ceromonies departs from the show's format to make jokes or ad-lib a bit, down goes the approval rating. The explanation of this phenomenon lies in the fact that these programs as a whole — like oysters and olives — are either liked or disliked intensely by the public. Those who like the program, when tested, look upon anything that -lands between them and the making of the fateful, sSO.OOO telephone call as an "obstacle." The) actually resent the mc. when he slows up the action. \\ hether or not the audience is thus "bought" b) the $50,000 phone gimmick i a moot point. Hut — and this is the real point it is the main reason win listeners are listening. In such a case, the giveawa) is the Class I Program Sponsor Net Hollywood Calling Gruen NBC Stop the Music (also TV) Lorillard Smith Bros., Speidel ABC Sing It Again Carter Prods. CBS Name the Movie Revere Camera ABC Two of these shows are based on musical gimmicks, two on Hollywood questions, but all four are built on the phone call-gift idea. The giveaway dominates the show. (Left: Bert Parks calls a listener in "Stop the Music") Class II Program Grand Slam Double or Nothing Queen for a Day Bride & Groom Sponsor Net Continental Bkg. CBS Campbell Soup NBC Miles Labs MBS Sterling Drug ABC A dozen network programs in this group emphasize a strong studio-audience factor, and place less emphasis on home audiences. Often, the prize may be bigger than in Class I shows, but the listener is not attracted primarily by it. (Left: John Reed King presents some loot on "Give and Take.") "entertainment. t h e psychological craving that the show fulfills for the listener. Actually, if the joke, or routine, or whatever it is that is making the listener chafe while he waits for the telephoning to start, were to be removed from the show, it might well stack up as "entertainment" on its own. This is just the point that producers hammer on, albeit largely inaccurately, when seeking a rationalization that will "excuse"' monster giveaways. However, when the entertainment portion is added to the giveaway. the type of listener and the type of mind that the giveaway appeals to feel frustrated by it. If a "Class I" promam were to be built, as programs like Suspense and Casey, Crime Photographer were built, 1>\ analyzing the SPONSOR