Sponsor (Jan-June 1954)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

1. W FILM: $60 million business /j\t\ -mi i |cii\ Fairbanks shot the lir-i made-for-h him in 1946 -a lowbudget episode of Public Prosecutor id \\\(. tin t\ film program industi\ has grown so fast lew admen can keep track of it. M.inv a client todaj i hew itched, bothered and bewildered bj the ei^htyear-old marriage "I t\ and the movie industry. Man) an agencj or station film buyer lit tried t<> look into the future of the multi-million dollar film syndication business and bas found it as clouded as a London fog. What's happening with color films? What arc the trend in multiple-market spotting oi syndicated films? What's the qualit] <>f the merchandising offered bj film distributors? Are the pricing formulas becoming stabilized? Is the industr) basicall) sound? How fast is it really growing? What about reruns? These were just a few of the ques tionwhich SPONSOR editors discovered were hot topics among clients and agencic-. \nd these questions formed the basis ol extensive questionnaires used to survey all the leading film producers and distributors. Briefly, this i the -ize and shape of the syndicated tv film program business as of now : • Syndicated films are hip business. Film producers and distributors were asked in sponsor's questionnaires to reveal their gross business during the past year. On a confidential basis nearl\ all gave answers. This total was measured against the total of all tv film companies with weighting to get a projection, sponsor's guesstimate for the 1954 business in tv program films i not including feature-lengths or commercials): over $60 million. • The business is still grow ing. Some more industry estimates: back in 1948. between 7 and 10' r of the program Bchedule of the average network-affiliated tv outlet was on film; today, the figure is calculated to be about 35' 1 . even though the total number of telecasting hours of the average tv outlet has increased nearh four times. As far as film production is concerned, distributors estimate that the 1953 output was 300' '< over that of 1952 — and still climbing. These are highlights. In succeeding pages, you will find detailed reports. They include an up-to-the minute report on film industry progress in color television, a study of the rerun film market, a report on tv film production costs and an up-to-date list of film-. Here, topic by topic, are other major developments in the tv film syndication business which emerged in sponsor's stud\. ► Color films: There's no hotter topic in the video Ziv TV is acknowledged leader in booming syndication field, currently has eight tv film series before cameras. Below, executives of Carter Products and SSCB agency meet with Ziv officials to discuss promotion plans for Carter-sponsored film show, "Mr. District Attorney." L. to r.: Russ Clancy, Ziv a.e.; Barrett Welch, SSCB a.e. for Carter's; M. J. "Bud" Rif kin, Ziv tv sales manager; Alan Miller, ad manager of Carter 52 SPONSOR