We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.
Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.
NCS ISSUES A
REPORT LIKE
THIS FOR EACH RADIO
AND TV STATION
In Green, Pa.
table A
KAAA Green,
Pa.
table B
IARKET COVERAGE
1
NCS DAT-PART CIRCULATION
OMIS BEACHED • DAY Oft NIGHT
LISTENER HOMES, SEPARATELY. DAYllMt AND NIGHT TIME
STATE
TOTAL HOMES IN AREA
MONTHLY
COVIIAOI
WIIKIT COVIIAOI
STATE COUNTY
RADIO HOMES IN AREA
DAYTIMI li.lo,. Dork i
NIOHTT1MI (AH.. Dark)
OONTY
HOMES
Morket lnd« ■
HOMES
Mo'hef nd,.
WEEKLY
DAILY
WEEKLY
DAILY
BEACHED
%Tot. %«adw
BEACHED
%T«
%Bo<J>o
NCS OBC %
NCS CIBC %
NCS OBC %
NCS OBC
%
OHIO
ON?
26,700
i.120
19 20
4,350
16
IT
8ELMONT
25.600
2.560 10
1.530 6
!.**> IS
2.560
10
E«SCN
28.100
3.520
13 13
2,980
11
11
JEFFERSON
27.100
2.710 10
1.350 5
1,620 6
540
2
54,800
6.640
7,330
52 . 700
5,270
2,880
5,»60
3. tOO
LV4NU
PENNSYLVANIA
■iHENY
4*6,200
115.260
25 26
93,090
20
21
ALLEGHENY
443,100
66,490 15
22.160 5
4... 330 10
26 . 590
6
■ft
51,300
25.500
50 51
21,000
41
42
BEAVER
50,000
20,000 40
17,500 35
W.500 25
10,000
20
TTE
51,700
7,»30
14 15
5,450
11
11
FAYETTE
49,500
4,950 10
1.480 3
3,960 8
1.980
4
N
12,300
2,3*0
19 20
1.870
15
16
GREEN
11.700
230 2
LT
1 . T50 13
930
8
MET
22,300
3.600
16 17
2,760
12
13
SOMERSET
21,200
2.420 11
1.210 6
1,010 5
000
4
INSTON
60. «00
14,650
24 25
12,890
21
22
WASHINGTON
58,600
11,720 20
<1,960 17
6,4*0 11
5,270
9
WOE LAND
90,300
26,070
29 30
22,590
25
26
WESTMORELAND
86,900
20,850 24
13.030 15
10,420 12
8,690
10
744 , 700
194,850
159,650
721,200
126,660
65,340
80,410
54 , 260
NO
MARYLANO
5ANT •
27,000
6,890
26 27
5,610
21
22
ALLEGANY •
25,500
5,100 20
3,820 15
2.550 10
1 ,T80
T
I TT •
5,200
1,240
24 27
1,010
19
22
GARRETT •
4,600
920 20
690 15
460 10
320
7
32,200
8.130
6,620
30,100
6.020
4,510
3,010
2,100
IROINIA
WEST VIRGINIA
« •
7,000
1 .020
15 15
820
12.
12
BROOKE •
6,800
680 10
470 7
540 8
270
4
0« •
9,000
1.320
15 15
1,060
12
12
HANCOCK •
8,800
880 10
61" 7
700 8
350
4
ISON
22,900
5.130
22 23
4,240
19
19
HARRISON
22,300
3.340 15
1,560 7
2.230 10
1,330
6
ON
20,000
1.940
10 10
1,360
7
7
MARION
19.400
1.160 6
770 4
380 2
LT
HALL
9.200
1.250
14 14
800
9
9
MARSHALL
8,900
E20 7
530 6
350 4
260
3
MALI*
16,000
3,430
21 22
2,810
18
18
MONONGALIA
15,600
1,560 10
1.400 9
2.340 15
1,710
11
23.000
. 16,880
73 75
14,180
62
63
OHIO
22,500
9 , 000 40
6,750 30
9.000 40
6.750
30
SANTS •
1.600
150
9 10
120
8
8
PLEASANTS •
1.500
90 6
60 4
70 5
40
3
TON •
7.500
730
10 10
580
8
8
PRESTON •
7,300
430 6
290 4
360 5
210
3
1IE •
3,000
290
10 10
230
8
8
RICHIE •
2,900
170 6
110 4
140 6
80
3
M •
♦ ,500
440
10 10
350
8
8
TAYLOR •
4.400
260 6
170 4
220 5
130
»
t •
2,600
250
10 10
200
8
6
TYLER •
2,500
150 6
100 4
120 5
70
3
!L •
4,900
460
9 10
370
8
8
WETZEL •
4,600
270 6
180 4
230 5
130
1
131,200
33,290
27,120
127.500
18,610
13.000
16.680
11,330
H
962,900
244.910
200,720
TOTAL
931,500
156,560
85,730
105.560
70,790
MONTHLY data indicates the "outer reach of a station's coverage." Its chief value i .i a yardstick for inter-media comparisons, nut a i"<>] for choice of station
DAYTIME information pinpoints each station's circulation on aweekrj and daily basis, before 6:00 p.m. 'f'li i~ data ran help buyers compare station coverage in specific areas
NIGHTTIME circulation of a station ran differ material!} from daytime coverage. Breakdown before and after 6:00 p.m. helps buyers chose according to campaign aims
The remaining counties were polled \ia written questionnaires that duplicated the procedure in the persona] interviews.
Q. Hon does this NCS radio-tv i irculation information compare with UiC information on newspaper and magazine circulation?
A. The Audit Bureau of Circulation shows purchase, not readership of -[indie newspapers and <>r magazine-. In other words. \BC figures represent the number of people who Inn a particular newspaper or magazine, not the people who read it. The NCS circulation figures -how how mam homes in each county are actually reached • luring given periods bj specific radio and or t\ stations.
Q. Wluil information does NCS No. 2 pro ride about each station?
A. NCS No. 2 provides individual reports for each radio and tv station in the county. Broadly, each report gives market coverage data and NCS daypart circulation. There will also be area summaries and network reports.
Here's what the reports on individual stations include:
1. Market coverage data: Basicalh. this section shows the number of homes in each county and the number of receiver (radio and tv) homes.
Also, NCS shows the percentage of total home in each countv that an individual station reaches and the percentage of receiver homes reached. The first figure (percentage of total homes) makes it possible for admen to draw broad inter-media conclusions, measuring radio versus t\ or l\ against newspapers, magazines.
The percentage of receiver homes a station reaches makes it possihle for
ARTICLE IN BRIEF
Main uses of NCS No. 2 are to guide timebuyers' choice of stations; relate radio-tv budgets to sales areas; aid inter-media comparisons. Penetration figures, based on 140,000 families, show station coverage, not program popularity on monthly to daily base
timebuyers to determine how thai station compares in a particular count)
with other stations.
Both sets of percentage figures are given on a monthly and on a weekl) basis.
2. VCS day-part circulation: Vgain,
NCS gives the information for each countv in which a Malum ha an\ audience whatsoever. It lists the numbei ol radio or t\ homes in the countv, the number of home a station reaches weekl) and dailj during the daytime, .mil what percentage of the receive] homes this penetration represents. \i S shows comparable figures tor night' time.
Q. What use 'mi advertisers and
agencies ma/.c <w \( >' No. 2 data?
A. Ad managers will be aide to allocate advertising budgets more aci in atelj based on < J i — I ■ ihution area <>i dealer districts. I!\ studying the county-by-count) Listening and viewing pattern revealed in the report, the) will have a yardstick for determining where radio-t\ spending would he most efficient. The co\era^e data will also
Sl>0\-<u;
I mi i miser 1956
37