Star-dust in Hollywood (1930)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

Star-dust in Hollywood book had to be an exact length. A director ordered to make a seven-reel film could not offer a six or eight-reeler. Often when the film has passed through the cutter's and the director's hands it is still too long. The good continuity-man ought to devise his scenes so that the finished film is an exact length, but during the production other scenes may be inserted, or sometimes, in an uncanny way, as may happen to all artistic creation, the very work seems to take charge and run off with the makers. In spite of a business-like surface, a very strange kind of incompetence is tolerated in Hollywood. The art is in many ways a ring, and once inside a man is fairly secure. The outsider must be twice as talented as the insider to push him from his job. So that often a quite the cutter notorious incompetence may be tolerated. A well-known case was that of an author, experienced in movie work, who was commissioned to write a story for a seven-reel film. He made his own continuity, the filming of which consumed twenty reels of film. With the best will in the world, the director could not cut it down to an inch less than fifteen reels. At enormous expense another expert was hired who managed to cut it to twelve, but there it stuck. Finally the first author was called in again, was paid another big fee, and succeeded in reducing it to the stipulated length. He was hailed as a saviour instead of being cursed in the first place as an incompetent. [ii6]