Star-dust in Hollywood (1930)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

Star-dust in Hollywood translation of the Hollywood booze-party into other terms. In fact, one witty American reviewer coupled together Aimee's book, In the Service of the Lord, with Isadora Duncan's My Life, and dexterously drew out their parallelisms. The reasons for both revivalism and booze-parties lie in the comparatively resourceless nature of the modern mind, in its lack of interests beyond business and its lack of hobbies. The folk-spirit, that inner stimulus urging even the ordinary man toward creative impulses in his spare time, seems to be almost completely wanting. Few pursue any quiet personal task careless of reward ; there is little gardening, little music, except of a professional or sexually exhibitional nature, no home carving — fretwork or construction. In a Middle Western swindler's office thousands of letters from victims were found all complaining of the unrelieved monotony of their lives. And, as a cure or a change, whether the victim goes to the Lord or whether he goes to the devil seems a matter of pure chance and the influences among which he falls. The modern revivalist, like the old, is supplying a longfelt want, but he is also modern in his methods. He has no more use for leather lungs, in spite of the Reverend Billy Sunday, ex-pugilist, who tears souls from their lethargy by every physical violence possible to a preacher. For Aimee, with her woman's voice, easily outbrays him, assisted by her voltage and amplifiers. Her voice blares from a cluster of trumpets, and she preaches not only to the comparatively small concentration of souls in her Temple, but to the vibrant ether. She converts not only the sinner but the microphone itself, and a hundred, two hundred miles away, in San Francisco, or on the arid plains of New Mexico, her disembodied voice is struggling with sin wherever the sinner has got his aerial tangled in the proper wave-length. The massed trumpets lent a clarion note to the sermon, caricaturing the preacher's voice, though not disguising its odd person [258]