Talking pictures : how they are made and how to appreciate them (1937)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

EDITING THE FILM Very few persons who attend motion pictures have any conception of what happens to a film production following the completion of photography; or, in studio parlance, "after the cameras stop grinding." Almost every fairly regular theatregoer, who also reads the photoplay pages of his or her daily paper, can more or less correctly define the work of a cameraman, a director, or a star. But to all except a very few such cinematic terms as "laboratory," "cutting," "hypo," and "soup" have no more meaning than a sermon in the Greek language delivered to a tribe of Kaffirs in darkest Africa. For those who really want to understand and enjoy motion pictures this is not a healthy condition. The period required to produce "finished prints" — those used for actual theatrical exhibitions — is one third of the whole time needed to carry a story from words on a few hundred sheets of paper, to the pictured images which parade nightly across the metalized screens of thousands of motion picture theatres. The period of photography is only one sixth of the total. And yet because it is more glamorous and more spectacular, easily ten times as much is known about its processes than about those concerned with selection [216]