Talking pictures : how they are made, how to appreciate them (c. 1937)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

Talking Pictures page of this book first by telegraph and then by television. To do this by telegraph each letter is methodically spelled out and if there are twenty-five hundred letters on each page it would require about twenty-five minutes per page. Now if it were possible to have a mechanical eye and brain capable of reading the entire page in a small fraction of a second, and transforming it into electrical impulses like rapid telegraph dots, we could send the contents of this page perhaps thirty times each second. If these successive transmissions of the contents of the page could now be received, not by the ear of the receiving person, which is sensitive only to relatively few impulses per second, but by his eye, which is capable of perceiving the very large number of impulses each second of which visible light waves are composed, he might be able to understand what was sent over the telegraph just as well and perhaps more easily than if he were listening to the telegraph dots. For now he would be "seeing" the page not as a group of separate dots, but as though it were a half-tone photograph like those in newspapers. The eye blends the dots of which the image is composed together, and if there are a great many dots in the image the detail is fine and clear. It is to secure fine detail that the television image must be broken up into as many tiny dots as possible. Of course this image would only last for one thirtieth of a second and it would make a very poor impression on the brain. If these images were to follow one another each one thirtieth of a second, the eye would see an apparently continuous picture of the page as though it [280]