The technique of film editing (1958)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

THE DOCUMENTARY FILM OF IDEAS The brief analyses of sequences from Eisenstein's October in the first chapter give a clue to the way a silent film director set about the task of expressing ideas in the film medium. Although Eisenstein's silent films all had a rudimentary story to tell, it was the speculations arising out of the plots which seem to have interested him most and which remain the films' most notable feature. Eisenstein repeatedly allowed himself (in October and Old and New) screen time for, as it were, intellectual cadenzas for which he had to evolve his own system of film montage. He assembled series of physically unconnected images and linked them according to their intellectual content : he built sequences not so much about an event or a piece of action as about an idea. One of the difficulties of this approach, as we have already seen, was that the intellectual passages were undramatic and were therefore not easily assimilated into a film narrative. Eisenstein himself was aware that the montage of ideas was a difficult and in many ways inadequate method of expression. He wrote in 1928 : " The tasks of theme and story grow more complicated every day ; attempts to solve these by methods of ' visual ' montage alone either lead to unresolved problems or force the director to resort to fanciful montage structures, arousing the fearsome eventuality of meaninglessness and reactionary decadence."1 As a result, he welcomed the advent of sound, claiming that, used contrapuntally — " treated as a new montage element (as a factor divorced from the visual image) " — sound would enrich the expressiveness of his montage methods. Unfortunately, the change of policy in the Russian film industry which was initiated in the early 'thirties and the fact that Eisenstein was never allowed 1 Film Form by Sergei Eisenstein. Dobson, 195 J, p. 257. The quotation is from " A Statement,"" written in August, 1928, and signed by Eisenstein, Pudovkin and Alexandrov. 156