"Television: the revolution," ([1944])

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

"WHAT DO YOU EXPECT IN TELEVISION" 39 of living: a means of visual entertainment to supplement, but not replace, motion pictures. The public is going to look on television as ex- actly what it is—a new entertainment form— and not expect it to infringe on the territory of any other means of entertainment which has given them satisfaction. * * # Now comes a very delicate question in the public's demands on television. Will John Jones insist on "immediacy"? Will he insist that the programs he sees now be taking place in front of a television camera at the same instant? The insistence on immediacy has been a prime thesis of all major network broadcasting policy. In sound broadcasting, this has been intended to discourage the development of large tran- scription networks, which might eventually threaten the existence of the instantaneous wired chains. Partially in self-defense of its own exist- ence, the wired network has preached a policy: "Would you rather kiss a girl or her picture?" —the inference being that non-instantaneous broadcasting was vastly less satisfactory than flesh-and-blood entertainers, performing now. Experience does not bear out the network's