Theory of the film : (character and growth of a new art) (1952)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

94 CHANGINGSET-UP world, from his viewpoint and out of his mood, as completely deformed. The film can show not only a drunk reeling along the street, but those distorted reeling houses as well, which the drunk sees with his drunken eye. His subjective vision is reproduced by the film as objective reality. A film once showed the same street in four entirely different aspects, when four different people walked along it, each seeing it in his own fashion. We saw the same houses, shopwindows, street lamps, poster hoardings, once with the eyes of a fat and contented shopkeeper, once with the eyes of an empty-bellied unemployed workman, of a happy lover, of an unhappy lover — the objects were the same but their pictures were very different, although all that was different was the set-up and angle. THEME WITH VARIATIONS This sort of thing can be compared with a theme with variations, a mighty example of which can be seen in Dovzhenko's film Ivan. The film shows the building of the great Dnieprostroi dam four times. First it is seen by Ivan, the peasant lad who has just come from his village to find work on the great project. It is a night picture and shows a terrifying, infernolike chaos. Smoking, flame-belching furnaces, incomprehensible, mythical monsters. A confused, impenetrable, titanic jungle of enormous iron beams and wheels within wheels. It is the peasant boy's vision of an industrial building site and the cameraman with his set-up has drawn its terrifying outlines. The next time we see the site, it is with the eyes of Ivan who is now a full-fledged industrial worker. Now it is a picture of order and purpose. A steel structure of reason moving precisely on pinion-wheels of logic. Clear, exact, transparent, it is as if the inner mechanism of a creative brain had been laid bare. Ivan is working there and he knows what he is doing and why. Then we see the giant hydro-electric station in the making a third time, but not with the eyes of Ivan. This time the eyes belong to a woman whose son has been crushed to death by