Theory of the film : (character and growth of a new art) (1952)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

THE WORK OF ART AS OBJECT 115 lift them out of the dynamic stream of the action. Such beauty has its own centre of gravity, its own frame and does not reach beyond itself to the preceding and the subsequent. 'Je hais le mouvement qui deplace les lignes, wrote Baudelaire in his sonnet on beauty. But the film is art in motion. THE WORK OF ART AS OBJECT The film is faced with a peculiar problem if it has to reproduce not nature but an already existing work of art, a painting, a sculpture, a puppet play, i.e. when the camera merely copies what a painter or sculptor or carver has already created as a work of art. But if such works of art are presented as a visual experience of a character in the film, from the angle, both external and internal, from which the character views them, then the cameraman is confronted with a very intricate and interesting task. The terrifying Asiatic Gothic of the medieval icons photographed in Eisenstein's Ivan the Terrible shows not only already existing works of art but the savage superstitions and visions of a tormented people. When in Alexander Korda's Lady Hamilton the prospective husband leads the poor ignorant girl past all the accumulated works of art in his mansion, the camera shows not only works of art but the good taste and culture of a superior social environment, which are destined to have a decisive influence on the heroine and thus have an important dramaturgic function. Works of art may thus play a part in front of the camera, reverting, as it were, to the state of raw material, imposing on the camera the difficult task of adding to the given expression of the object a further, secondary expression by means of angles and set-ups. This secondary expression is that of the effect made on the spectator. In fact a gifted cameraman can show a picture or sculpture in the same way as an orchestra conductor can give voice to a musical score. In such productions two artistic personalities are merged in one another.