Theory of the film : (character and growth of a new art) (1952)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

156 PROBLEMS OF STYLE IN THE FILM sible value of a painting, but no such value can be manifested without recourse to colour — colour is the only medium in which it can be perceived in a painting. The dialogue is not a specific feature of the talkie; it is a far older and more essential component of both the drama and the epic. But the basic forms of film art previously mentioned, determine other, specific, new laws according to which dialogue can be used in films, and which lend the film dialogue a new specific character and produce specific effects. PURE CINEMATOGRAPHY Years before the sound film was invented, the means of expression of the silent film had acquired such wealth and subtlety that a tendency had arisen which advocated the discarding of all other means of expression — notably the story — entirely. At that time artists in other spheres of art were also searching for and insisting on a 'pure' style. But nowhere did such demands appear as justified as in the sphere of filmic art. We have seen that microphysiognomy and microdramaturgy, angle, set-up and cutting had acquired a creative force which could penetrate so deeply to the core of life, reproduce so vividly the raw material of reality, as to find sufficient expressive dramatic elements in it without a need for a constructive 'plot', a preliminary literary treatment, a story, a script. This trend established the artistic principle that the camera ought not to illustrate novels or plays written in advance (even if specially written for the purposes of the given film) but should create its works of art by the direct approach of the camera to the raw material of life. It should seek its subjects not in epic or dramatic happenings but in simple visibility, in visual existence. Approximately the same postulate had a couple of decades before eliminated the 'theme' from painting. It cannot be denied that this demand for a 'pure style' had some artistic justification in the sphere of the film and the followers of this trend undoubtedly enriched cinematic art by certain variants of style and form. Soon however this school, known in European cinematic art as avantgardism, developed