Theory of the film : (character and growth of a new art) (1952)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

184 FORMALISM OF THE AVANT-GARDE Nor is it an abstraction of natural noises, for those are of an entirely heterogeneous order. The circle is the abstract form of a spherical apple. But of what existing thing is music an abstraction? A tune is no more abstract than is an expressive gesture of the limbs. It is an expressive gesture in sound. It is no more abstract than is architecture. The tones of the scale provide the concrete material out of which musical constructions are built. Music has its abstraction though — the written music, the score. This abstract, merely visible and thinkable music shows that there is a corresponding concrete, i.e. audible music. Abstract symbols have another remarkable quality which should be mentioned here. Even a minature of Mount Everest or of the ocean can convey the immensity of these objects. That is a matter for the inherent monumentality of the presentation. But abstract forms cannot possess such inherent monumentality, they cannot convey dimensions greater than their own. A circle or a triangle conveys an impression of its own actual size only, and not of any greater. For if a picture depicts something, the depicted object may be a thousand times larger than the picture itself. If it depicts nothing, just exists, then the picture can show only itself, its own size.