Theory of the film : (character and growth of a new art) (1952)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

CARTOONS 193 nificently horrible and nauseating. But if he had to put a proletarian into one of his drawings, he did not know what to do. He did not want to draw a satirical caricature of him, for that was not how he saw and wanted to show the working man. On the other hand could he mix his witheringly sarcastic monstrosities with figures drawn with a gentle, affectionate touch? Only one solution seems possible here : to use the style of children's drawings, a device often adopted by many a mature master. In such drawings the distortion is motivated by the child's lack of skill and this serves as an excuse for making the figures which are intended to arouse sympathy just as funny as the others. With the coming of sound, possibilities of a new acoustic humour and of a new extraordinary musical artistry opened up before the cartoon film. This new form of art, of which Walt Disney is the undisputed king, will be discussed later in connection with the specific problems of the sound film. 13