Start Over

Theory of the film : (character and growth of a new art) (1952)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

CHAPTER SEVENTEEN DIALOGUE When the talkie made its appearance, there was a panic among the producers, directors, actors and script writers. This was another thing that had never happened before in the history of any other art; that the technical development of the medium of expression should have so embarrassed the artists who practised the art. The anxiety and uncertainty had many reasons. The talking film seemed to threaten the international validity of the silent film and by rendering export much more difficult, endanger the financial and business interests which had invested in it. Many directors and actors lacked the required ability to deal with speech. It is characteristic that no one objected to the appearance of sound in the film. Charlie Chaplin was prepared on the spot to use the craziest sound effects. In his first sound film he accidentally swallows a whistle which begins to whistle at the most inopportune moments. It was only speech against which the almost universal objections were raised. Artists and theoreticians mobilized the traditional laws of art, philosophy and aesthetics against the talking film, just as they had done against the silent film — and with the same lack of success. How silly the resistance to the talking film was can be gauged if we imagine what would have happened if the Lumieres had constructed a sound camera at the same time as the silent camera — a supposition which is not impossible in principle. Had they done so, no one would have conceived the crazy idea of presenting dramatic scenes in dumb-show. Everyone would have condemned such an idea as inartistic, unnatural and ridiculous. To show people talking without sound, mouthing the words without saying them ! And then they disappear and we read what they were supposed to say, in the 221