Theory of the film : (character and growth of a new art) (1952)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

CHAPTER EIGHTEEN PROBLEM OF THE SOUND COMEDY The conceptual, rational quality of the word makes the sound-film comedy a rather special problem. The distortion of visual forms appears as a distortion only if we remember the original form of which it is a distortion and recognize it in the caricature. Unless this is so, we would be seeing just another form with no relation to any other living thing. The caricature is the more effective, the more it resembles its original. But a sound, as we have already said, is not capable of varied angles. Any change in a sound simply produces another sound which has no connection with the previous one. Of course the analogy to a shape is not a single sound but a sound picture or melody, and caricatures of melodies are within the range of possibility. But how can one distort the voice of a living being or the noises of nature in such a manner as to keep them still recognizable? Are improbable sounds, fantastic or grotesque noises possible at all? We can imagine fairies or witches or ogres or dragons and other fairy-like characters and draw them too — but fairy-tale sounds, fairy-tale voices and noises . . . what are they like? We can invent all sorts of non-existent and impossible things but we cannot invent impossible sounds, that is sounds which could not be heard in reality, for we must produce them if we invent them. A picture being an image, an illusion, may be the image of something non-existent and merely imagined. The sound in a film is on the contrary not an image of a real sound, but a repetition, a re-voicing of the real sound itself. In other words it is impossible to invent an impossible sound. 232