Theory of film : the redemption of physical reality (1960)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

EXPERIMENTAL FILM 179 stead of recognizing the new aesthetics inherent in the Lumiere brothers' camera, she argues, one was content with subordinating it to traditional aesthetics: "One set out to group animated photographs around an external action . . . rather than studying, for its own sake, the conception of movement in its brutal and mechanical visual continuity . . . one assimilated the cinema to the theater." In conclusion, Mme Dulac accuses those who imprison cinematic action in a narrative of a "criminal error."6 It was logical that Assassination of the Due de Guise, the first film d'art and the archetype of all theatrical films to come, should be rediscovered by the avant-garde and exhibited in their moviehouses to the accompaniment of music ridiculing it.7 LIMITED RECOGNITION OF THE STORY Despite the deprecation of the story film, however, many avant-garde film directors refused to dispense with a story— partly for the simple reason that the industry insisted on it as a prerequisite of appreciable box-office returns.* Abel Gance, Marcel L/Herbier, and Jean Epstein experimented within the framework of commercial films. Of special interest is a group of avant-garde story films which includes, for instance, Delluc's Fievre, Germaine Dulac's The Smiling Madame Beudet, Cavalcanti's En rade, and Kirsanov's Menilmontant. These films had a characteristic in common which sets them apart: unlike the contrived plots of the contemporary screen, their tenuous intrigues were in the nature of real-life episodes. That dedicated representatives of the movement thus endorsed the episode, clearly suggests that they believed it least to interfere with what they considered pure cinema.** Yet it will suffice here to mention these excursions into story-telling in passing. Within the present context the emphasis is not so much on them as on the non-story film which was the avant-gardes chief concern after all. Cinematic language Determined to strip film of all theatrical and literary elements that threatened to overlay its substance, the artists of the 'twenties conceivably * In 1925, Rene Clair, who never fully endorsed cinema pur anyway, expressed himself in favor of compromises with the commercial cinema. He jesuitically suggested that the avant-garde film director should introduce, "by a sort of ruse, the greatest number of purely visual themes into a scenario made to satisfy everyone." (Clair, Reflexion faite, p. 104. See also Brunius, "Experimental Film in France," in Manvell, ed., Experiment in the Film, pp. 89-90.) ** For the episode film, see chapter 14.