Theory of film : the redemption of physical reality (1960)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

222 III. COMPOSITION to the spirit of a medium privileged to capture "the ripple of leaves in the wind."* There is a nice observation by Bela Balazs to the effect that children linger over details while adults tend to neglect the detail in some big design. But since children see the world in close-ups, he argues, they are more at home in the atmosphere of film than in the long-shot universe of the theater.10 The conclusion, not drawn by Balazs himself, would be that the theatrical film appeals to adults who have suppressed the child in themselves. ATTEMPTS AT ADJUSTMENT The "most marvelous things7 feyder's dictum Jacques Feyder, the French film director, once postulated that "everything can be transferred to the screen, everything expressed through an image. It is possible to adapt an engaging and humane film from the tenth chapter of Montesquieu's L'Esprit des lois as well as ... a paragraph of Nietzsche's Zoroaster." Yet to do this, he cautiously adds, "it is indispensable to have the sense of the cinema."11 Assuming for the sake of argument that Feyder is right, the theatrical story would certainly not resist cinematic treatment. But how can it be transformed into authentic cinema? In narrating such a story, any film maker who has the sense of the medium is obviously faced with two different, if not incompatible, tasks. He will have to put across the story as the purposeful whole it is— a task requiring him to reproduce its complex units and patterns of meanings in a straight manner. At the same time he will have to follow the realistic tendency — a task which prompts him to extend the story into the dimension of physical existence. STRAIGHT REPRESENTATION OF THE INTRIGUE Many theatrical films, among them some executed with consummate skill, live up to the first task without even trying to pursue the second. They adequately impart the intrigue, with all its inherent, meanings but, as if completely absorbed in its straight representation, fail to explore the world around us. The Informer, Glass Menagerie, Mourning Becomes Electra, Death of a Salesman, Rouge et Noir, etc., are hardly more than custom-made adaptations of tightly composed stories detachable from the medium; they fit the story like a well-tailored suit. Hence an atmosphere *Seep. 31.