To prohibit and to prevent the trade practices known as "compulsory block-booking" and "blind selling" of motion-picture films in interstate and foreign commerce .. (1939)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

Calendar No. 573 T6th Congress ) SENATE j Kept. No. 532 1st Session ) \ Part 2 TO PROHIBIT AND TO PREVENT THE TRADE PRACTICES KNOWN AS COMPULSORY BLOCK BOOKING AND BLIND SELLING OF MOTION-PICTURE FILMS IN INTERSTATE AND FOREIGN COMMERCE June 7 (legislative day, June 5), 1939. — Ordered to be printed U.S. Cono^Tes'^ . ?)er^aIt£ . Mr. Smith, from the Committee ,on Interstate Commerce, submitted ^ the following MINORITY VIEWS [To accompany S. 280] The minority does not concur with the majority report on S. 280 submitted by Mr. Neely, from the Committee on Interstate Commerce, to whom was referred the bill (S. 280) to prohibit and to prevent the trade practices known as compulsory block booking and bhnd selling of motion-picture films in interstate and foreign commerce. It is our opinion that this bill, as a control over the licensing of motion pictures, is not necessary. Our judgment is that no injury to the commerce of the United States in the hcensing and distribution of motion pictures warrants legislation that wiU result in radically altering a system that has proven to be economical and practical to all three branches of the industry. We are of the opinion that the enactment of this bill into law would result in decrease of employment both in production and distribution and an increase in cost to the theater owner and the public. The subcommittee of the Committee on Interstate Commerce held public hearings on the bill from April 3 to April 17, 1939. The record of these hearings, printed for the use of the Committee on Interstate Commerce, covers 651 pages. Immediately after the record of the subcommittee hearings were printed, a majority of the Committee on Interstate Commerce voted to report the bill to the Senate. Senator Neely has submitted a report favoring the bill. Of the 48 witnesses who came to Washington and appeared before the subcommittee during the hearings on the bill, the record shows that 34 testified in opposition to the bill and that 14 were in favor of it. All of the \yitnesses from the motion-picture industry who appeared at the hearings, except the 5 spokesmen for an organization Imown