Transactions of the Society of Motion Picture Engineers (1916)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

An elementary investigation will show that in the case of the Petzval type of projection objective generally in use, a considerable amount of the light proceeding from the margins of the machine aperture {or film picture) is intercepted within the mounting or tube of the objective, and can not therefore reach the projection screen. By the use, however, of the types of objectives recommended in this paper, a considerable amount of light which fails to reach the projection screen, due to the vignetting action of the customary objective, may be fully availed of, because anastigmatic objectives, such as those used in photography, are characterized by a much shorter distance between their front and rear components than is the case with the Petzval objective. In virtue of this fact, a modern form of objective of compact construction can transmit as much light as a larger aperture objective of the same focal length but with greater separation between the components, and when we consider that the visible effects of aberration increase with increase in the relative aperture, it is clear that improvement in motion picture screen delineations must be reached through the compact and efficiently corrected modern anastigmat objectives of similar type to those recommended. My thanks are due to Dr. Hermann Kellner for having kindly gone over this paper prior to its presentation before the Society, and also for some demonstrations relating to the subject made at the Bausch & Lomb Optical Works. 17