We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.
Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.
104 Transactions of S.M.P.E., Vol. XIII, No. 37, 1929
278. Exhib. Herald and Mov. Pict. World 93 Sect. 1 (Nov. 24, 1928) p. 34.
279. U. S. Pats. 1,674,810; 1,675,573; 1,677,310; 1,679,695; 1,685,281; Brit. Pats. 288,146 ; 300,818 ; Fr. Pat. 633,305.
280. Filmtechnik 4 (Oct. 13, 1928) p. 407; also Phot. Ind. 26 (Sept. 26, 1928) p. 1002.
281. New Phot. 11 (May 19, 1928) p. 181.
282. Phot. Dealer 42 (Nov. 1928) p. 528.
283. New Phot, il (Mar. 5, 1928) p. 556.
284. Movie Makers 3 (Nov. 1928) p. 738; also Filmtechnik 4 (Oct. 27, 1928) p. 427.
285. Movie Makers 3 (Dec. 1928) p. 812;. ibid. 4 (Jan. 1929) p. 886; Amat. Films 1 (Dec. 1928) p. 76.
286. Movie Makers 3 (Nov. 1928) p. 739.
287. Movie Makers 3 (Sept. 1928) p. 611.
288. Movie Makers 3 (Aug. 1928) p. 536.
289. Movie Makers 3 (July 1928) p. 477.
290. Phot. Era 60 (May 1928) p. 307; Ed. Screen 7 (June 1928) p. 165.
291. Sci. Amer. 140 (April 1929) p. 354.
292. Movie Makers 3 (Dec. 1928) p. 774.
293. Eev. franc. Phot. 8 (Oct. 15, 1927) p. 301.
294. Brit. Pat. 297,995.
295. U. S. Pat. 1,690,616.
296. Mees, Camera Craft 35 (Sept. 1928) p. 403; also J. Frank. Inst. 207 (Jan. 1929) pp. 1-17; Capstaff and Seymour, Trans. See. M. P. Eng. 12 No. 36 (1928) p. 940.
297. E. C. Anthony, Movie Makers 3 (Dec. 1928) p. 771.
298. A. Jaschke, B. J. 75 (Oct. 26, Nov. 2, 1928) pp. 647 and 663.
299. H. Fraenkel, Mot. Pict. News 38 Sect. 1 (Dec. 29, 1928) p. 1925.
300. Mot. Pict. News 39 (Jan. 12, 1929) p. 95.
301. Mot. Pict. News 38 (Dec. 1, 1928) p. 1665.
302. Mot. Pict. 4 No. 6 (1928) p. 6.
303. Mot. Pict. 4 No. 12 (1928) p. 6.
DISCUSSION
Mr. Eichardson : That report does credit to Mr. Crabtree. One thing I did not hear mentioned, however, and one which is most important in many ways, is that through an improvement very soon to be realized, the heat on the film at the projector aperture, which was working great damage, is to be reduced by a half without any reduction in the light. In fact, according to demonstrations I have witnessed, there is an increase in the light and better general results on the screen and the heat is reduced, so that I have held my hand in the beam of the Peerless spot for three or for seconds before it became uncomfortable.