Transactions of the Society of Motion Picture Engineers (1929)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

MOTION PICTURE ACTIVITIES IN THE UNITED STATES ARMY Lieutenant Colonel Walter E. Prosper* THE first interest displayed by the United States Army in motion pictures was in the field which, at the time, it shared in common with the rest of the world, the field of amusement. During the early history of the motion picture, the Army was concerned solel}' with the entertainment value of pictures and motion picture shows were to be found in every Army post. Even under canvas in the field, the troops had picture shows. They were welcomed by officers and enlisted men alike. I doubt if there has ever been devised a method of entertainment that more perfectly meets the demand of the military for sane and wholesome recreation than the motion picture. In most commands, a bugle call announced the hour of pictures. In my experience only one other call awakened more general interest in the command — the one known to all soldiers as ^'Pay Day", announcing the presence of the pajnnaster in camp. There is no record of the Army realizing the instructional value of film prior to the entry of the United States into the World War. This is easily explained. The military arm of the country during the days I am discussing was a small, compact, highly trained body of regular soldiers. The most efficient method of instruction, that of actual practice, drill and maneuver, was in vogue. The results produced hj this method were entirely satisfactory. There was no need for intensive high speed training of large bodies of untrained men, such as became imperative when once the World War broke upon us, and, therefore, no necessity existed for increasing the methods of instruction employed in the Army at that time. The World War brought with it many problems for the United States Army. In a short time our small regular force of 165,000 grew to four million men. Military organizations of over a thousand men frequently included not more than one Regular Army officer. The training problem soon grew to tremendous size and importanee. "■ Signal Corps., U. S. Army, Washington, D. C. 355