Society of Motion Picture Engineers : incorporation and by-laws (1929)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

Borax Developer — Moyse and White 449 with the omission of metol, 16 minutes agitated development gave a barely perceptible density at the longest exposure given the test strip. Needless to say, such development is worthless. Mixing again, this time including the metol but omitting the hydroquinone, produced a fairly satisfactory developer, one which produced densities which differed but very slightly from those produced by the complete formula. In the case of the second series a similar test was made, the results of which are presented in Fig. 4. Here the borax concen 20 /s J.O OS y Figure 4. Eight minute developments with: Sodium sulfite, 75 g/1; metol, varied; borax, 5 g/l; hydroquinone, varied. Emul. 2568. CiiYve No. Metol Hydroquinone Fog 1 0 20 .07 2 2.5 0 .07 3 2.5 5 .08 4 2.5 10 .10 tration is higher than in the previous case and the hydroquinone alone does develop noticeably, but still not enough to make a worthwhile developer by itself. Metol alone is very satisfactory and the densities differ but little from those produced with an additional 5 or 10 gm. hydroquinone. The tests showed a tendency for fog to increase more than in proportion to the additional development produced by the increase of hydroquinone. The net result was that cleaner, more satisfactory development was obtained by increasing the time some twenty per cent with metol only as a reducer. The degree of increase of fog with hydroquinone differed somewhat between different emulsions, and in many cases was serious.