TV Guide (July 30, 1955)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

WE ASKED THEM Is 'Live’ TV On The Way Out? June Havoc, star of the filmed Willy: “The superior quality and scope of film is unde¬ niable, but that doesn’t make all film shows great. Neither does immediacy necessarily make all live TV ex¬ citing. For the actors, film is preferable because repeated showings mean more money.” Ed Sullivan, emcee of the live-and-film Toast of the Toton: “Film means rerun revenue, simultaneous showings, better light¬ ing and a chance to use material from the whole wide world. But live TV offers that all- important spontaneity, timeliness and lower production costs.” Danny Thomas, star of the filmed Make Room for Daddy: “Pro¬ grams like political conventions, sporting events, musical extrav¬ aganzas and special plays should be seen live. But a performer in a weekly series can relax on film—and put on a better show. Isn’t that what’s important?” Max Liebman, pro¬ ducer of NBC’s live “si>ectaculars: ” “Fine shows can be done on film, but to me the immediacy of a live show transmits itself to an audience in far more exciting fashion. Television, a new me¬ dium, should continue to manifest a unique style and technique.” Donald O’Connor, who switched from live to film: “There are cer¬ tain production values which can best be cap¬ tured on film, especial¬ ly for music^ comedy shows. But I believe filmed shows will look more ad lib in the fu¬ ture and occasional fluffs will be retained for that spontaneous look.” John L. Sinn, presi¬ dent of Ziv Television Programs, Inc.: “Film programming is sup¬ planting many hours of live presentation. This demonstrates not only audience accept¬ ance, but also the be¬ lief of outstanding per¬ formers, writers, directors and producers that film offers the best.” 7