United Artists Corporate Minutes (Jan-Dec 1939)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

Cee ; : ae NS ge Al bse s a <a eas toh % / edb |. Terai Ss =i . 3 , ¥ ay ee i¢ @ { a ann e mo Se ¢ July 11, 1939.-°™" +, se: Mi RESOLVED, thet the resolution of the Board of Directors of February 13, 1939, ; be amended to comply with the Gen_ eral Manager*s recuest. o fneeitimienentarlincnmninn te EC ae. a é Argentine 1931 Incche Tax " was tabdled until the next meeting. i7. The General Mansger renorted thet ur. Buckley, ecting under his direction, had concluded an agreement with 5 fooker Lithodteck Co., whereby the present contract between Tooker Lithograph##o. and United Artists Corvoration has been extendsa for a period of one_year from July 5, 1939. Fe _ & memorandum from Mr. Buckley on this aabjece was, read to the Board. eae . , 18. The General Meneger requested thet the Treasurer be authorized to pay to-Messrs. Sonnenschein, Berkson, Lautmann, Levinson & Morse, eas per Mr. Raftery's letter of July &, 1939, e fee of $1000. Messrs. Sonnenschein, Berkson, Lautmann, Levinson & Morse have been engaged by General Counsel to pepresent United Artists in the contempt oroceedings now pending before the United States District Court in Chicaga in the case of U. S. v. Balaban, et al. 2 . Upon motion duly made, seconded and unanimously adopted, it was ie Pe Ni aoe oe at Bo Shs Ce ody ee ae