U. S. Radio (Jan-Dec 1961)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

• At about loin mil of live m.i lions surveyed, programing ol public service features seems preferred to public: affairs announcements. A breakdown of total public service broadcasting bonis shows program ing at 70% vs. announcements at About one-third of the report ing stations el. inn .1 step-up in him 1 view and talk programing. Onl\ about 10% report an increase in discussion shows, but one of these was a 350% gain in air lime. A few individual c ui-bac ks were noted in the service show, agricultural, and icligion categories. • More public service broadcast ing is being sponsored by advertise! s. • About one out of I In <c si .1 1 ions now base public aflaiis managers, public seiviee directois, 01 public service co-ordinaioi s on tbeii stalfs. At the othei outle ts, it is usually the progiam diicctoi who is responsible for public service broadcasting. > SHOWS UPBEAT NEWS AND EDITORIAL TRENDS f that question. Responsibility for the accuracy of facts and figures rests with those stations providing the requested information. Trends emerging fiom these figures are outlined in the adjacent story. Programing by type panel ann. other Public service gain or loss, by type int. doc. com. news relig. talk serv. disc. agri. misc. rel. ann. Does sta. air Type of editorials? edit, issue" + 5 2.4 14.0 + 2 +1.5 Y L + + + Y 3 RL —100 Y 1 NRL 1 6 + 5 +3 Y 2 RL 25 25 N Y 3 RL Y RL 50 Y 1 NR +50 Y 1 NRL 7 4 8 +10 Y 1 NL + 2 N 15 15 + 5 —5 Y 2 NRL 3 50 +10 —100 +15 Y 1 RL 4 26 + 3 N 30 20 + — + N 11 Y 3 NRL 15 5 Y 1 L +11 +17 +12 +42 N N N + . + Y 3 NRL Y 1 L N 10 20 + — Y 1 L 20 4 40 +50 +50 +50 Y 5 NRL 10 20 N Y-15 NRL + + 17 Y 7 NRL N + Y RL 10 20 +10 Y 1 RL 10 20 50 + + N 10 25 Y 3 NRL 2 1 5 +10 N — 6 —20 +350 N U. S. RADIO/September 1961 17