11. Memorandum for His Excellency, the Governor of New York, in opposition to an act entitled "To regulate the exhibition of motion pictures, creating a commission therefor, and making an appropriation therefor." Date: 1921 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: July 19, 2022 Excerpt: adequate for "dealing with obscene plays or shows— People vs. "Doris, 14 App. Div. N. Y. 117. Censorship
12. Memorandum for His Excellency, the Governor of New York, in opposition to an act entitled "To regulate the exhibition of motion pictures, creating a commission therefor, and making an appropriation therefor." Date: 1921 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: July 19, 2022 Excerpt: beyond dispute the law is adequate: Muller's case, 96 N. Y.^-0^ People vs. Doris, 14 App. Div. 117
13. The Fatty Arbuckle case Date: 1962 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: July 25, 2024 Excerpt: . Here Doris tried to get him started again, but this time 151
14. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 5 Date: 1914 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: September 21, 2023 Excerpt: , sir. Q. And that is the Doris at Wilkinsburg? A. Yes, sir. Q. And when you opened
15. The educational screen Date: c1922-c1956] Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: July 19, 2022 Excerpt: amusing. Doris May, Creighton Hale, Louise Fazenda, Stuart Holmes, Rosemary Theby, and others
16. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 1 Date: 1913 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: May 23, 2024 Excerpt: each Change. Number of Reels Mon Tues Wednes Thurs Fri Satur Sunand day
17. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 3 Date: 1913 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: July 11, 2024 Excerpt: day after its release, that is to say, is not exhibited anywhere, will a theatre give as
18. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 2 Date: 1913 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: June 13, 2024 Excerpt: ., Vitagraph Company of America." RELEASE DAY. The definition of "release day" will hereafter be
19. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 4 Date: 1913 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: July 25, 2024 Excerpt: film per day. Q. And in 1908, what was it? A. In 1908 it was increased to possibly
20. Jurisdictional disputes in the motion-picture Industry : hearings before a special subcommittee of the Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, Eightieth Congress, first-session, pursuant to H. Res. 111 (Eightieth Congress) Date: 1948 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: July 19, 2022 Excerpt: day to receive your compensation ? Mr. Mackay. No, my regular day was on Thursday. Mr
