51. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 6 Date: 1914 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: September 12, 2024 Excerpt: "film," and is such use of the term sometimes confusing as to motion pictures and raw
52. National Archives and Records Service film-vault fire at Suitland, Md. : hearings before a subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives, Ninety-sixth Congress, first session, June 19 and 21, 1979 Date: 1979 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: July 19, 2022 Excerpt: 315 CONTENTS Summary of Findings Discussion of Findings A. General, Suitland Film Vaults
53. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 3 Date: 1913 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: September 12, 2024 Excerpt: have large quantities of old film, are able to make the required return of film from
54. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 1 Date: 1913 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: September 12, 2024 Excerpt: , but the film may be made of an entirely different composition which perhaps may be as
55. National Archives and Records Service film-vault fire at Suitland, Md. : hearings before a subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives, Ninety-sixth Congress, first session, June 19 and 21, 1979 Date: 1979 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: July 19, 2022 Excerpt: 465. 16 As you can see in attachment 5, Washington Film Laboratory. Inc. (R72-0287
56. The educational screen Date: c1922-c1956] Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: July 19, 2022 Excerpt: Page 12 The Educational Screen Left: Some of the cast from the I.E.A. film, "Backing Up the
57. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 1 Date: 1913 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: September 12, 2024 Excerpt: absolutely to stop. Q. When film is imported, what patent do you claim it violates? A. When
58. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 4 Date: 1913 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: September 12, 2024 Excerpt: competition has the General Film Company in your territory? First of all, will you tell me what
59. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 3 Date: 1913 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: September 12, 2024 Excerpt: 1612 Frank L. Dyer, Direct Examination. Portland, Ore., Mutual Film Corporation, 72
60. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 3 Date: 1913 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: September 12, 2024 Excerpt: Frank L. Dyer, Direct Examination. 1615 UTAH, Salt Lake City, Win. H. Swanson Film Co
